- Saturday Aft - October 6, 2018

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Field strength:  Mean: 2445 MP  Geomean: 1206 MP
(based on 33 players, 1 non ACBL player ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Barbara Gordon - Elaine Friedenberg 64.18 1st OA 2.77
Dave Anthony - Marjorie Ross 62.48 2nd OA 2.08
Bobbie Gomer - Rhoda Kauffman 62.05 3rd OA 1.56
Bernice Mendelsohn - Ruth Gordon 59.27 1st SA 1.39
Jack Mendelsohn - Joan Brandeis 59.19 2nd SA 0.97
Andrew Rosenberg - Fran Pach 57.23 4th OB 0.69
John Dickenson - Susan Morse 55.76 3rd SA 0.70
Nathan Schatz - Yacob(Jacob) Rubinstie 55.63 4th SA 0.49
Carl Ginsberg - Dianne Meyer 50.14 2nd SB 0.54
EVENT>Open Pairs               |SESSION>Saturday Aft |SECTION> A N-S
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>October 6, 2018    |CLUB NO.>227439    | 10/06/2018 16:00
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Steve Grossman  |RATING>Charity Club Championship    |MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   84.0 |TOP>   7 |MP LIMITS>None/2500/750  |CLUB>Yorktown Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=7/C=0                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Marjorie Ross          Dave Anthony             B   2     2     .   |   2     2     .    104.97  62.48  2.08(OA)
 2 Eleanore Goodman       Bonnie Glass Linsk       B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     65.93  39.24
 3 Bobbie Gomer           Rhoda Kauffman           A   3     .     .   |   3     .     .    104.25  62.05  1.56(OA)
 4 Diane Lapat            Bruce Young              B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     61.69  36.72
 5 Phyllis Weber          Edie McAlpin             B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     63.57  37.84
 6 Fran Pach              Andrew Rosenberg         B   .     4     .   |   4     3     .     96.15  57.23  0.69(OB)
 7 Helen Walker           Judi Shinberg            B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     61.87  36.83
 8 Barbara Gordon         Elaine Friedenberg       B   1     1     .   |   1     1     .    107.82  64.18  2.77(OA)
 9 Robert Levine          Arnold Selig             A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     92.82  55.25
                                          Totals                                            759.07

EVENT>Open Pairs               |SESSION>Saturday Aft |SECTION> A E-W
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
AVE>   84.0 |TOP>   7 |MP LIMITS>None/2500/750  |CLUB>Yorktown Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=5/C=4                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Gerry Jawer            Sandra Kayson            B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     64.38  38.32
 2 John Dickenson         Susan Morse              A   .     .     .   |   3     .     .     93.67  55.76  0.70(SA)
 3 Joan Brandeis          Jack Mendelsohn          A   5     .     .   |   2     .     .     99.44  59.19  0.97(SA)
 4 Nathan Schatz          Yacob(Jacob) Rubinstie   A   .     .     .   |   4     .     .     93.45  55.63  0.49(SA)
 6 Myrna Shervin          Frederick Holdsworth     C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     64.26  38.25
 7 Ruth Gordon            Bernice Mendelsohn       C   4     3     .   |   1     1     1     99.58  59.27  1.39(SA)
 8 Martin Britchkow       Andy Carr                C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     73.09  43.51
 9 Dianne Meyer           Carl Ginsberg            C   .     .     .   |   .     2     2     84.23  50.14  0.54(SB)
                                          Totals                                            672.10

Hands and Results
1 ♠JT864
KQ6
7
♣9862
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠973
94
AQT943
♣73
♠AKQ
752
J865
♣KQ4
♠52
AJT83
K2
♣AJT5
6
615
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2 1♠  ♦3 NT4
EW: 4 1NT  ♣4 ♥4 ♠6
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -130 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  140          6.93   0.07  3 S      A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
  110          5.79   1.21  2 S      A4-Lapat-Young vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
   50          4.07   2.93  5 W -1   A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
   50          4.07   2.93  4 W -1   A1-Ross-Anthony vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
         50    1.79   5.21  4 S -1   A9-Levine-Selig vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
         50    1.79   5.21  3 N -1   A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
        130    0.07   6.93  4 W      A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 Pass1NT2
2NTPass3Dbl
334All pass

East should open 1NT despite the 4333 pattern and minimum range values for the bid. The alternative bid of 1 loses credibility because of the extremely poor suit quality.

South will want to compete against 1NT and will make the partnership's system bid showing a major-minor two suiter. If no such pattern description is available, then pass is the better choice! Balanced hands defend. Putting all of one's eggs into a moderate five card suit without significant distributional features is a losing tactic. So I will assume for the sake of this analysis that South's 2 bid shows hearts and a minor, giving a wider, hence safer landing area for NS.

West will bid diamonds, presumably using the Lebensohl convention (starting with 2NT) to show a hand with competitive, not game-forcing, values and a long (at least six card) suit. 2NT in lebensohl FORCES 3 by opener, after which responder passes, bids a new suit a) below the overcaller's suit as a signoff b) cue bids the opponent's suit as Stayman with a stopper, c) bids a new suit at the three level higher than the opponent's suit as invitational to game in that suit, or d) bids 3NT to show a stopper in the opponent's suit with game forcing values. Playing lebensohl, a direct jump to 3NT following the overcall shows game points, but denies a major suit or a stopper in the overcalled suit. 3 directly, rather than using the 2NT relay, would be game forcing.

East, having heard about West's hand and the NS fit, should complete the auction by bidding 4 in the known ten-card fit. If any excuse or principle is needed to do so, pull out the LAW of Total Tricks to justify the bid.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

2 ♠J2
K73
KJ
♣AT7654
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠AQ976
952
A64
♣Q9
♠K83
AQJ4
QT87
♣J3
♠T54
T86
9532
♣K82
12
1213
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦3 ♥1 ♠2 NT3
EW: 3 4 4♠ 1NT  ♣6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -420 4♠-EW/4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          6.93   0.07  4♠ W -1   A1-Ross-Anthony vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
        170    5.21   1.79  3♠ W +1   A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
        170    5.21   1.79  3♠ W +1   A9-Levine-Selig vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
        420    2.93   4.07  4♠ W      A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
        420    2.93   4.07  4♠ W      A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
        450    0.64   6.36  4♠ W +1   A4-Lapat-Young vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
        450    0.64   6.36  4♠ W +1   A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  1Pass
12Dbl1Rdbl2
4All pass  
  1. Support double, showing three spades
  2. Rosenkranz redouble, showing the A or K of clubs!

When partner overcalls a suit, there are often opportunities to show a top honor in partner's suit by doubling or redoubling. Without going into a lot of theory, I do advocate the simplest of these honor-showing bids, and advocate your consideration of the idea. In particular, what is suggested is that your partnership agree what when the opening side makes a Negative Double of your side's overcall, a redouble by "ADVANCER" (the partner of the overcaller) shows specifically the ace or king of the overcalled suit. Nothing more to it than that. The idea is primarily to help the opening lead problem partner would otherwise face, but secondarily the bid can be helpful to competitive or constructive bidding as well. The bid does NOT promise support, and might be better used to show specifically Ax or Kx, so that partner can underlead the suit to the known honor and a ruff might be obtained in defense.

With real support it might be better to preempt or bid more constructively by cue bidding or the like.

On this deal, the Rosenkranz redouble helps north with his opening lead problem. Underlead the A to South's known K, and then South can lead a diamond back.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

3 ♠QT4
QT6
A76
♣QJ63
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠AK75
K832
942
♣AK
♠J98
AJ
KQT853
♣T5
♠632
9754
J
♣98742
11
1711
1
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦1 ♥3 ♠2 NT1
EW: 2♣ 6 3 4♠ 6NT
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -1440 6NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        600    6.36   0.64  5 W      A9-Levine-Selig vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
        600    6.36   0.64  5 E      A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
        660    4.07   2.93  3N W +2   A1-Ross-Anthony vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
        660    4.07   2.93  3N W +2   A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
        690    1.21   5.79  3N W +3   A4-Lapat-Young vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
        690    1.21   5.79  3N W +3   A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
        690    1.21   5.79  3N E +3   A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
1NTPass3NTAll pass

Easy auction, easy game. Now play it correctly. Assume what North plays the Q on opening lead. Win, perforce, and play a diamond. When it holds, play a spade to the ace and than another club. North will win and play another club, South having encouraged. West wins and should first cash the other top spade and then four more diamond winners. North, having the duty to protect all three of the other suits, will crumble into a thousand tiny pieces. the discards will tell all, and declarer will pick up the remaining tricks.

Be sure to cash that second spade before running the diamonds, or else the West hand will be squeezed before North. Cashing the second spade honor is a Vienna Coup.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

4 ♠A96
KQ865
KT6
♣K9
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠T732
J432
Q94
♣T7
♠Q5
A9
AJ7532
♣Q82
♠KJ84
T7
8
♣AJ6543
15
313
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 1/- 5/4 4♠ 4NT
       ♦7/6
EW:  ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠3 NT2
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +650 5-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  660          6.93   0.07  3N N +2   A9-Levine-Selig vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
  620          5.21   1.79  4♠ S      A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
  620          5.21   1.79  4 N      A1-Ross-Anthony vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
  600          3.50   3.50  3N N      A4-Lapat-Young vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
  150          2.36   4.64  3♣ N +2   A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
  140          1.21   5.79            A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
        300    0.07   6.93  3N N -3   A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
Pass12Dbl
33NTAll pass 

3NT might technically be described as an overbid, but South will not accuse North of overbidding when 3NT makes! North is justified in his second bid by the fact that South's hand is not well defined, promising some playing values and probably four spades, but without a concrete point-count. Passing by North is a worse offense than relying on partner for values.

Whatever finesse North decides to take is destined for success, and after trying one (probably clubs first), then the second one will be icing on the cake. If West is not careful to preserve all of his spades, declarer might take an embarrassing number of tricks. Ten tricks are North's due, but eleven are there when West tosses a spade.

Why should West defend correctly? Well, for one simple reason, it is a well-known and established principle that a defender should retain parity with a long suit in dummy on the right. West can turn his head 45 degrees to the right and see a spade suit with four cards. Then the head turns left and downward and there are four spades also in hand. Save them!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

5 ♠-
J984
8762
♣J8432
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠AJ7
AQ6
AJT5
♣AQ6
♠8532
T72
K94
♣975
♠KQT964
K53
Q3
♣KT
2
223
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4/5 NT3
EW: 3♣ 3 2 2♠ 4NT
LoTT: 13 - 14 = -1
Par: -430 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          6.93   0.07  3 E -2   A1-Ross-Anthony vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
   50          5.79   1.21  3N W -1   A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
        130    4.64   2.36            A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
        150    3.50   3.50  2N W +1   A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
        400    1.79   5.21  3N W      A4-Lapat-Young vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
        400    1.79   5.21  3N W      A9-Levine-Selig vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
        500    0.07   6.93  2♠* S -2  A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
6 ♠QJ54
Q9863
Q72
♣J
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠962
AJ54
A4
♣AT54
♠AKT87
T2
J9
♣K763
♠3
K7
KT8653
♣Q982
8
1311
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3
EW: 4♣ 2 4♠ 4NT  ♦5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -500 5*-NS-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  300          6.93   0.07  4♠ E -3   A1-Ross-Anthony vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
  200          5.21   1.79  4♠ E -2   A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
  200          5.21   1.79  4♠ E -2   A9-Levine-Selig vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
  100          2.93   4.07  4♠ E -1   A4-Lapat-Young vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
  100          2.93   4.07  4♠ E -1   A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
        110    1.21   5.79  2♠ E      A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
        140    0.07   6.93            A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
7 ♠Q
97654
QT96
♣T75
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠T43
T3
K8432
♣Q62
♠AJ975
KJ2
J75
♣A9
♠K862
AQ8
A
♣KJ843
4
514
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1 2  ♠5 NT6
EW: 2/1♠  ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +110 3♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  300          7.00   0.00  2N E -3   A1-Ross-Anthony vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
  100          6.00   1.00  2♠ E -1   A9-Levine-Selig vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
        100    4.00   3.00  3 S -1   A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
        100    4.00   3.00  3 N -1   A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
        100    4.00   3.00  3♣ S -1   A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
        110    1.50   5.50  2♠ E      A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
        110    1.50   5.50            A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
        140    0.00   7.00  1♠ E +2   A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
8 ♠K975
K2
QJ5
♣JT85
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠AJ8
9743
43
♣AK74
♠T642
AQJ85
K86
♣2
♠Q3
T6
AT972
♣Q963
10
1210
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1/-  ♦7/6 ♥3 ♠4 NT5
EW: 4 2♠ 2NT  ♣6 ♦6/5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -420 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          6.50   0.50  4 E -1   A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
   50          6.50   0.50  4 E -1   A9-Levine-Selig vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
        140    4.50   2.50  3 E      A1-Ross-Anthony vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
        140    4.50   2.50  3 E      A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
        170    2.00   5.00  3 E +1   A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
        170    2.00   5.00  3 E +1   A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
        170    2.00   5.00            A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
        420    0.00   7.00  4 E      A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
9 ♠AK96
J93
73
♣J963
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠T872
AKQT7
T62
♣K
♠Q5
8652
54
♣QT852
♠J43
4
AKQJ98
♣A74
9
124
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 4 3♠ 2NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣4 ♦3 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          6.50   0.50  3 W -2   A1-Ross-Anthony vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
  200          6.50   0.50  3* E -1  A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
  130          4.00   3.00  4 S      A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
  130          4.00   3.00  3 S +1   A9-Levine-Selig vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
  130          4.00   3.00            A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
  110          1.50   5.50  3 S      A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
  110          1.50   5.50  3 N      A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
         50    0.00   7.00  4 S -1   A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
10 ♠A74
763
K762
♣Q32
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠8653
KT54
AJ943
♣-
♠JT
QJ982
Q5
♣AK76
♠KQ92
A
T8
♣JT9854
9
813
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2♠  ♦5 ♥4 NT6
EW: 2 3 1NT  ♣3 ♠5
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          4.07   2.93  4 E -1   A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
  100          4.07   2.93  4 E -1   A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
  100          4.07   2.93  4 E -1   A4-Lapat-Young vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
  100          4.07   2.93  4 E -1   A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
  100          4.07   2.93  4 E -1   A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
  100          4.07   2.93  3 E -1   A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
        140    0.07   6.93  2 E +1   A1-Ross-Anthony vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
11 ♠Q
A632
A7432
♣T62
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠AJT2
K95
JT6
♣954
♠98643
Q8
K98
♣J73
♠K75
JT74
Q5
♣AKQ8
10
96
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 3 4 1♠ 1NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT4/3
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +420 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  420          5.21   1.79  4 S      A4-Lapat-Young vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
  420          5.21   1.79  4 S      A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
  420          5.21   1.79  4 S      A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
  420          5.21   1.79  4 S      A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
         50    1.21   5.79  4 S -1   A1-Ross-Anthony vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
         50    1.21   5.79  4 S -1   A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
         50    1.21   5.79  4 S -1   A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
12 ♠732
T952
T932
♣97
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠KJ9
AJ7643
QJ5
♣5
♠-
KQ8
A876
♣KQJ842
♠AQT8654
-
K4
♣AT63
0
1215
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♠  ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 NT3
EW: 5/4♣ 4 5 4NT  ♠4
LoTT: 20 - 19 = +1
Par: -450 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  150          6.93   0.07  6 W -3   A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
  100          5.21   1.79  6* W -1  A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
  100          5.21   1.79  5 W -2   A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
   50          3.50   3.50  5 W -1   A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
        200    2.36   4.64  4♠* S -1  A4-Lapat-Young vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
        450    0.64   6.36  5 W      A1-Ross-Anthony vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
        450    0.64   6.36  4 W +1   A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
13 ♠9765
K54
954
♣742
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠T32
9863
AQT
♣965
♠AQJ8
QJT
63
♣AKQJ
♠K4
A72
KJ872
♣T83
3
620
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3
EW: 4♣ 2 4/3 4♠ 4NT
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -630 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          6.93   0.07  4♠ W -1   A1-Ross-Anthony vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
        600    5.21   1.79  3N E      A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
        600    5.21   1.79  3N E      A4-Lapat-Young vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
        620    2.93   4.07  4 E      A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
        620    2.93   4.07  4 E      A9-Levine-Selig vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
        630    0.64   6.36  3N E +1   A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
        630    0.64   6.36  3N E +1   A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
14 ♠Q87532
KJ63
86
♣Q
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠AKT
42
AQJ932
♣K6
♠964
AT8
K5
♣T9873
♠J
Q975
T74
♣AJ542
8
177
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT3
EW: 3♣ 3 1♠ 3NT  ♥5
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -400 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
         50    6.93   0.07  3 N -1   A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
        130    4.64   2.36  3 W +1   A1-Ross-Anthony vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
        130    4.64   2.36  3 W +1   A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
        130    4.64   2.36  2 W +2   A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
        150    2.36   4.64  3 W +2   A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
        180    1.21   5.79  2N E +2   A9-Levine-Selig vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
        430    0.07   6.93  3N W +1   A4-Lapat-Young vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
15 ♠A82
73
A9743
♣AK3
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠T643
9
82
♣JT9854
♠KJ975
KQ2
KQT
♣Q2
♠Q
AJT8654
J65
♣76
15
116
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 4 1NT  ♣6 ♠5
EW: 1♠  ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +500 4♠*-EW-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  800          6.93   0.07  4♠* E -4  A1-Ross-Anthony vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
  650          5.21   1.79  4 S +1   A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
  650          5.21   1.79  4 N +1   A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
  620          3.50   3.50  4 S      A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
  500          2.36   4.64  4♠* E -3  A9-Levine-Selig vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
  300          1.21   5.79  4♠* W -2  A4-Lapat-Young vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
   50          0.07   6.93  4♠ E -1   A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
16 ♠K83
T842
J63
♣763
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠752
AQJ95
KT8
♣AK
♠AQ96
73
AQ97
♣942
♠JT4
K6
542
♣QJT85
4
1712
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦1 ♥1 ♠1 NT1
EW: 3♣ 6 6 6♠ 6NT
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -1440 6NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        660    5.21   1.79  3N W +2   A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
        660    5.21   1.79  3N W +2   A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
        660    5.21   1.79  3N W +2   A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
        660    5.21   1.79  3N W +2   A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
        690    1.21   5.79  3N W +3   A4-Lapat-Young vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
        690    1.21   5.79  3N W +3   A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
        690    1.21   5.79  3N E +3   A9-Levine-Selig vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
17 ♠97643
AJ4
42
♣KQ2
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠A82
K93
Q6
♣JT765
♠QT5
T765
T73
♣A93
♠KJ
Q82
AKJ985
♣84
10
106
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 2 3♠ 4NT  ♣6
EW: 1♣  ♦3/2 ♥5 ♠4 NT3
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +430 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  150          6.36   0.64  1N S +2   A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
  150          6.36   0.64  2 S +3   A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
  140          4.64   2.36  3♠ N      A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
  110          2.93   4.07  2 S +1   A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
  110          2.93   4.07  2 S +1   A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
   90          1.21   5.79  2 S      A4-Lapat-Young vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
        100    0.07   6.93  3N S -2   A9-Levine-Selig vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
18 ♠AK74
KQ986
K2
♣T5
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠Q95
7432
AQ
♣AK87
♠J32
J5
JT76543
♣J
♠T86
AT
98
♣Q96432
15
154
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3 2♠ 3NT  ♦4
EW: 2  ♣4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +300 4*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  500          6.93   0.07  5* E -3  A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
  150          5.79   1.21  4 E -3   A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
  130          4.64   2.36  4♣ S      A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
  100          3.50   3.50  4 E -2   A4-Lapat-Young vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
   50          1.79   5.21  3 E -1   A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
   50          1.79   5.21  3 E -1   A9-Levine-Selig vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
        100    0.07   6.93  2♠ S -1   A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
19 ♠QT6
KQ53
K9642
♣6
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠J5
JT6
T83
♣AQJ98
♠K92
A8
AQ7
♣T5432
♠A8743
9742
J5
♣K7
10
913
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1♠  ♣3 ♦6 NT4
EW: 4♣ 1 3NT  ♥6 ♠6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -500 4♠*-NS/4*-NS-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  110          6.93   0.07  1♠ S +1   A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
  100          5.79   1.21  4♣ E -1   A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
         50    4.64   2.36  2♠ S -1   A9-Levine-Selig vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
        100    2.93   4.07  3 N -2   A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
        100    2.93   4.07  3 N -2   A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
        130    0.64   6.36  4♣ E      A4-Lapat-Young vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
        130    0.64   6.36  3♣ W +1   A1-Ross-Anthony vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
20 ♠8654
AQ75
975
♣J7
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠A72
J92
Q
♣QT8532
♠KQ93
T63
KJ86
♣A6
♠JT
K84
AT432
♣K94
7
913
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣5 ♥6 ♠5 NT6
EW: 2♣ 1 1♠ 1NT  ♦5
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -90 1NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          5.79   1.21  2♠ E -1   A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
  100          5.79   1.21  2♠ E -1   A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
  100          5.79   1.21  3♣ W -1   A9-Levine-Selig vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
         90    2.36   4.64  1N W      A1-Ross-Anthony vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
         90    2.36   4.64  1N W      A4-Lapat-Young vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
         90    2.36   4.64  2♣ W      A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
        120    0.07   6.93  1N W +1   A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
21 ♠AJ72
Q7
AKQ92
♣A6
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠95
K985432
-
♣J732
♠KQT
AT
JT876
♣KQ4
♠8643
J6
543
♣T985
20
415
1
Double Dummy Makes
NS: -/1♠
       ♣5/4 ♦6 ♥2 ♠6/7 NT5
EW: 2♣ 1 5 2NT  ♠6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -450 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  150          6.93   0.07  2N N +1   A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
        100    5.79   1.21  2N N -1   A9-Levine-Selig vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
        200    3.50   3.50  2N N -2   A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
        200    3.50   3.50  3 W +2   A1-Ross-Anthony vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
        200    3.50   3.50  3 W +2   A4-Lapat-Young vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
        800    0.64   6.36  4♠* N -3  A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
        800    0.64   6.36  3* N -3  A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
22 ♠AJ8
74
KQJ3
♣KJT6
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠KQ4
A95
AT7542
♣4
♠T952
KJ32
-
♣Q9873
♠763
QT86
986
♣A52
15
136
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/-♣ 1 2NT  ♣7/6 ♥6 ♠6
EW: 1 1♠  ♣6 ♦6 NT5
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          6.93   0.07  2 E -2   A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
  150          5.79   1.21  1N N +2   A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
  100          3.50   3.50  2 W -1   A4-Lapat-Young vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
  100          3.50   3.50  2 W -1   A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
  100          3.50   3.50  2 W -1   A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
   90          1.21   5.79  1N N      A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
         90    0.07   6.93  2 W      A1-Ross-Anthony vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
23 ♠T2
K87642
52
♣KT8
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AK8754
J
KJ643
♣A
♠963
-
AQT9
♣Q96432
♠QJ
AQT953
87
♣J75
6
168
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣2 ♦0 ♠0 NT1
EW: 5♣ 7 7♠ 1NT  ♥5
LoTT: 20 - 21 = -1
Par: -2210 7♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        680    6.93   0.07  5♠ W +1   A1-Ross-Anthony vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
        710    4.07   2.93  4♠ W +3   A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
        710    4.07   2.93  4♠ W +3   A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
        710    4.07   2.93  4♠ W +3   A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
        710    4.07   2.93  4♠ W +3   A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
        800    1.21   5.79  4* S -3  A4-Lapat-Young vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
       1100    0.07   6.93  5* S -4  A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
24 ♠J
QJ93
KJ96
♣A732
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠Q62
5
AT42
♣KQJ86
♠AKT8743
7
Q873
♣4
♠95
AKT8642
5
♣T95
12
129
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3  ♣2 ♦4 ♠2 NT5
EW: 2/3♣ 3 4♠  ♥3 NT5
LoTT: 19 - 21 = -2
Par: -300 5*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          5.79   1.21  6♠ E -2   A1-Ross-Anthony vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
  100          5.79   1.21  5♠ E -2   A7-Walker-Shinberg vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
  100          5.79   1.21  4♠* E -1  A4-Lapat-Young vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
   50          3.50   3.50  5♠ E -1   A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
        420    1.79   5.21  4♠ E      A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
        420    1.79   5.21  4♠ E      A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A2-Dickenson-Morse
        450    0.07   6.93  5♠ E      A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
25 ♠6
Q75
KQT62
♣A952
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠K975
AK8
AJ74
♣84
♠T4
T32
9853
♣KQ63
♠AQJ832
J964
-
♣JT7
11
155
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 1♠  ♦6 NT6
EW: 1 1NT  ♣6 ♥6/5 ♠6/5
LoTT: 14 - 15 = -1
Par: -90 1NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  140          6.93   0.07  2♠ S +1   A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
         50    4.64   2.36  2♠ S -1   A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
         50    4.64   2.36  2♠ S -1   A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
         50    4.64   2.36  2♠ S -1   A9-Levine-Selig vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
        100    1.79   5.21  3♠ S -2   A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
        100    1.79   5.21  2♠ S -2   A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
        150    0.07   6.93  3N N -3   A4-Lapat-Young vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
26 ♠KT97
82
532
♣K752
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠62
JT643
T6
♣9643
♠AQ843
AQ97
KQ4
♣Q
♠J5
K5
AJ987
♣AJT8
6
119
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3/2  ♥3 ♠5 NT6
EW: 4 1♠  ♣4 ♦4 NT4
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: -500 5*-S-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  110          6.93   0.07  2 S +1   A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn
        140    4.64   2.36  3 W      A9-Levine-Selig vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
        140    4.64   2.36  3 E      A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
        140    4.64   2.36  2 E +1   A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
        170    1.79   5.21  3 E +1   A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
        170    1.79   5.21  3 E +1   A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
       1400    0.07   6.93  5* S -5  A4-Lapat-Young vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
27 ♠AJ
AJ
KQ9743
♣A43
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠KQ7643
KQT4
-
♣JT8
♠T852
5
A6
♣KQ7652
♠9
987632
JT852
♣9
19
119
1
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5 3 1NT  ♣3 ♠3
EW: 3♣ 3♠  ♦2 ♥4 NT5
LoTT: 20 - 21 = -1
Par: +300 5♠*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  300          6.93   0.07  5♠* W -2  A6-Pach-Rosenberg vs A3-Brandeis-Mendelsohn
  100          4.64   2.36  5♠ W -1   A2-Goodman-Glass Linsk vs A4-Schatz-Rubinstien
  100          4.64   2.36  5♠* W -1  A4-Lapat-Young vs A8-Britchkow-Carr
  100          4.64   2.36  5♠* W -1  A5-Weber-McAlpin vs A1-Jawer-Kayson
        100    2.36   4.64  5 S -2   A9-Levine-Selig vs A9-Meyer-Ginsberg
        590    1.21   5.79  4♠* E     A3-Gomer-Kauffman vs A6-Shervin-Holdsworth
       1100    0.07   6.93  5* S -5  A8-Gordon-Friedenberg vs A7-Gordon-Mendelsohn